Appearance, including facial expression, posture, and clothing provide important visual communications to observers.
-*How accurately do observers comprehend these visual communications?
Clik here to view.

Laura Naumann
Clik here to view.

Simine Vazire
Sonoma State University’s Laura Naumann collaborated with Simine Vazire of Washington University in St. Louis, University of Cambridge’s Peter Rentfrow, and Samuel Gosling of University of Texas at Austin to evaluate observers’ accuracy in judging personality traits based on the appearance of people they didn’t know.
Clik here to view.

Peter Rentfrow
Volunteers rated 10 personality traits (Paul Costa and Robert McCrae’s Big Five: Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, as well as likability, self-esteem, loneliness, religiosity, and political orientation) attributed to people pictured full-body photographs.
Clik here to view.

Samuel Gosling
The research team compared these measures with ratings by the photographed person and people acquainted with the person.
Clik here to view.

Paul Costa
Observers’ judgments were accurate when they rated extraversion, self-esteem, and religiosity among people photographed in a “standardized” pose, and were correct for even more of personality traits when judging photographs in spontaneous poses and facial expressions.
This suggests that candid photographs can provide even more accurate cues to some personality characteristics than planned poses.
Clik here to view.

Robert McCrae
According to Naumann’s team, static cues such as clothing style, and dynamic cues including facial expression and posture provided “cue validity” that enabled observers to make accurate judgments of personality characteristics by “cue utilization.”
Clik here to view.

John Irving
These findings confirmed that observers can make accurate inferences about some personality characterics based on visual cues about others, validating novelist John Irving’s same assertion through his narrator, John Wheelwright, in A Prayer for Owen Meany: “Things often are as they appear. First impressions matter.”
-*How accurate are your judgments of personality traits in people you don’t already know?
-*How accurate are other people’s inferences about your personality traits?
->Follow-share-like http://www.kathrynwelds.com and @kathrynwelds
RELATED POSTS:
- Symbolic Practice Improves Memorization, Performance
- “Everything is Negotiable”: Prepare, Ask, Revise, Ask Again
- “Self-Packaging” as Personal Brand: Implicit Requirements for Personal Appearance?
- Executive Presence: “Gravitas”, Communication…and Appearance?
- How Much Does Appearance Matter?
- Self Compassion, not Self-Esteem, Enhances Performance
- Inferring, Predicting Others’ Thoughts, Intentions, Behavior
Twitter @kathrynwelds
Blog – Kathryn Welds | Curated Research and Commentary
Google+
LinkedIn Open Group Psychology in Human Resources (Organisational Psychology)
Facebook Notes:
©Kathryn Welds
Filed under: Business Communication, Career Development, Personal Brand, Thinking Tagged: A Prayer for Owen Meany, appearance, Big Five, cue utilization, cue validity, dynamic cues, emotional expression, impression formation, inference, John Irving, John Wheelwright, Laura P. Naumann, Paul Costa, personality traits, Peter J. Rentfrow, Robert McCrae, Samuel D. Gosling, Simine Vazire, static cues, Trait theory, visual communication Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
